Impact of Acidified Sodium Chlorite and Enzyme Treatment on the Microbial Load and Energy Bioavailability of Feedstuffs

Document Type: Original Paper


1 Division of Avian Nutrition and Feed Technology, CARI, Izatnagar, India.

2 Division of Avian Medicine CARI, Izatnagar, India.


The presence of microbial load and high fiber content in various non conventional feedstuffs limit their utilization in poultry feed. In the present study, the feedstuffs were treated with acidified sodium chlorite (ASC) and its impact on  the microbial load and metabolizable energy availability was assessed in  the chickens. The effect of supplementation of feed grade enzyme was also evaluated either alone or in combination with ASC treatment.  ASC was prepared by adding citric acid to an aqueous solution of sodium chlorite (625 g/liter). The sanitizing effect of ASC was assessed at  0,  100,  250 and  500 ppm levels in  the meat cum bone meal (MBM) and sunflower meal (SFM), while its impact on  the energy bioavailability from SFM and de-oiled rice bran (DORB) was assessed  at  0, 100 and  250 ppm levels with (0.3  g/kg) and without exogenous enzyme supplementation.  The results revealed that  ASC treatment was effective in reducing  the  microbial load in MBM and SFM. Regarding  the metabolizable energy availability, ASC treatment produced appreciable improvement both in SFM and DORB, while enzyme supplementation was effective only with SFM. It may be concluded that ASC treatment has a sanitizing effect and improves the energy bioavailability from feed ingredients like SFM and DORB in the chicken.


APHA (American Public Health Association). 1984. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. 2nd Ed. 800 I Street, NW Washington, DC. 914 Pages.

AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists).  1990. Official method of analysis.  14th Ed. The William  Byrd Press. Richmond, Virginia, USA.  1230 Pages.

Canale CJ, Glenn BP & Reeves JB.  1992. Chemically treated alfalfa: lignin composition and in-situ disappearance of neutral detergent fibre components. Journal of Dairy Science, 75: 1543-1554.

Choct, M. 2006. Enzymes for the feed industry: past, present and future. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 62: 5-15.
Duncan DB. 1955. Multiple range and F tests. Biometrics, 11: 1-42.

Furlan AC, Mantovani C, Murakami AE, Moreira I, Scapinello C, & Martins EM. 2001. Use  of Sunflower Meal in Broiler Chicks Feeding. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 30: 158-164.

Goering HK, Smith LW, Van Soest PJ  &  Gordon CH.  1971. Digestibility of roughage materials ensiled with sodium chlorite.  Journal of Dairy Science, 56: 233-240.

Himathongkham S, Pereira MG & Riemann H.  1996.  Heat destruction of salmonella in poultry feed: effect of time, temperature and moisture. Avian Disease, 40: 72-77.

Hill FW  &  Anderson DL.  1958. Comparison of metabolizable energy and productive energy determinations with growing chicks.  Journal of Nutrition, 64: 587-603.

Mandal AB & Pathak NN. 1996. Comparative evaluation of metabolizable energy values of feedstuffs in chicken and guinea fowl.  Indian  Journal of Animal Science, 66: 930-934.

Mandal AB, Elangovan AV, Tyagi PK, Tyagi PK, Johri AK & Kaur S. 2005. Effect of enzyme supplementation on the metabolisable energy content of solvent-extracted rapeseed and sunflower seed meals for chicken, guinea fowl and
quail. British Poultry Science, 46: 75-79.

NRC (National Research Council). 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th Rev. Ed. National Academy Press. Washington, DC. 176 Pages.  

Sibbald IR  &  Slinger SJ.  1963. A biological assay for Metabolizable energy in poultry feed ingredients together with findings which demonstrate some of problems associated with evaluation of fats. Poultry Science, 42: 313-325.

Snedecor GW & Cochran WG.  1980.  Statistical Methods.  8th Ed. Iowa State University Press. Ames, Iowa. 503 Pages.

Williams JE. 1981. Salmonella in poultry feed – a world wide view - Part I. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 36: 6-19.

Warf CC Jr. 2001. The chemistry and mode of action of acidified sodium chlorite. IFT Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana. Page, 1-91.

Zombade SS &  Ichhponani JS.  1983. Nutritive value of raw, parboiled, stabilised and deoiled rice bran for growing chicks. Journal of the  Science of  Food  and Agriculture, 34: 783-788. 

Please cite this article as: Thakur R, Mandal AB, Parvin R & Yadav AS. 2013. Impact of acidified sodium chlorite and enzyme treatment on the microbial load and energy bioavailability of feedstuffs. Poult. Sci. J. 1 (1): 33-41.